UBEC Token Ecosystem - Core Beneficiary Profiles

Farmers, Communities, Community Activators, and Living Labs

Document Version: 1.1
Date: November 9, 2025
Purpose: Define the four core beneficiary groups receiving 65% of UBEC token allocation

Overview

The UBEC Protocol Suite dedicates 65% of issued utility tokens for general distribution to support: - Small farms committed to regenerative agriculture - Communities building local food sovereignty - Community activators facilitating ecosystem development - Living labs integrating environmental education, citizen science, and reciprocal economics

This document defines these four core beneficiary profiles across their journey from application through active participation.

The 65% Allocation Mission

Purpose: Crowd-fund and support human-scaled symbiotic sustainable regenerative food systems and local food sovereignty.

Core Criteria for All Beneficiaries: - Commitment to regenerative practices - Human-scaled operations - Symbiotic relationships with ecosystems - Sustainable methodologies - Focus on local food sovereignty - Community benefit orientation

Profile 1: FARMER

Definition

Individual farmers or farming households operating small-scale agricultural operations committed to regenerative food production methods.

Profile 1A: Applicant Farmer (Pre-Approval)

Status: Not yet in the UBEC ecosystem

Characteristics: - Operating or planning a small-scale farm - Committed to regenerative agriculture principles - Seeking funding/support for sustainable food production - May have limited capital for regenerative transition - Understands local food sovereignty concepts - Connected to or building community relationships

Application Triggers: - Need for equipment or infrastructure - Transition from conventional to regenerative methods - Expansion of regenerative practices - Starting a new regenerative farm - Recovering from setback (weather, economic) - Community-identified need for local food production

Evaluation Criteria: - Regenerative Commitment: - Soil health practices (no-till, cover crops, composting) - Biodiversity enhancement - Water conservation methods - Integrated pest management - Agroforestry or polyculture approaches

• Scale Appropriateness:
• Human-scaled operations (not industrial)
• Size appropriate to local context
• Labor primarily from family/local community

• Equipment and methods proportional to land

• Community Benefit:

• Local food supply contribution
• Community access to healthy food
• Knowledge sharing willingness
• Cooperative spirit

• Local market participation

• Sustainability Indicators:

• Long-term viability plan
• Resilience strategies
• Diversification approach
• Resource efficiency

• Closed-loop systems

• Symbiotic Relationships:

• Integration with local ecosystems
• Collaboration with other farmers
• Wildlife habitat preservation
• Soil organism cultivation
• Beneficial insect support

Application Process: 1. Initial Inquiry: Farmer expresses interest (web form, community referral, direct contact) 2. Information Gathering: Farm details, current practices, goals, needs 3. Site Assessment: On-site evaluation of current state and potential (could be virtual or in-person) 4. Community Validation: Local community input on farmer and proposed project 5. Plan Development: Collaborative development of regenerative agriculture plan 6. Evaluation Committee Review: Assessment against criteria 7. Decision: Approval, conditional approval, or guidance for reapplication 8. Agreement Drafting: Terms, expectations, token allocation amount, milestones 9. Agreement Signing: Legal commitment by both parties 10. Certification: Official recognition as UBEC-funded farmer 11. Token Allocation: UBEC tokens transferred to farmer's account

Token Allocation Factors: - Farm size and scope - Project complexity - Community benefit potential - Local cost of living - Specific needs (equipment, infrastructure, training) - Typically ranges: [Define your range, e.g., 1,000 - 50,000 UBEC tokens]

Required Documentation: - Farm location and size - Current practices documentation - Regenerative transition plan - Budget and resource needs - Community support letters (optional but valuable) - Timeline and milestones - Impact projections (food production, ecosystem health, community benefit)

Timeline: - Application to decision: 30-60 days (varies by complexity) - Agreement to token allocation: 7-14 days

Support During Application: - Application assistance (how to document practices) - Plan development guidance - Technical resource connections - Peer farmer connections - Community liaison support

Profile 1B: Funded Farmer (Post-Approval)

Status: Active UBEC ecosystem participant

Characteristics: - Received initial UBEC token allocation - Implementing agreed regenerative agriculture plan - Building presence in ecosystem - Developing relationships with other participants - Contributing to local food sovereignty - Learning and adapting practices

Initial Holonic Category: Typically starts as "Participant" (0.4-0.6) - New to ecosystem (low history) - Building network connections - Establishing transaction patterns - Beginning Ubuntu alignment journey

Token Usage Patterns: - Purchase inputs (seeds, tools, materials) - Exchange with other farmers (knowledge, labor, equipment sharing) - Pay for services (consulting, technical support) - Trade for community goods - Hold for future needs/growth - Contribute to community initiatives

Responsibilities: - Implement regenerative practices as agreed - Report on progress and milestones - Participate in knowledge sharing - Contribute to local food production - Build relationships with other ecosystem participants - Maintain commitment to sustainability principles - Share learnings and challenges

Success Indicators: - Agricultural Outcomes: - Soil health improvements - Biodiversity increases - Water conservation achievements - Yield sufficiency (not necessarily maximization) - Chemical input reductions - Carbon sequestration

• Community Outcomes:
• Local food supply contribution
• Community access improvements
• Knowledge sharing events
• Cooperative partnerships

• Market participation

• Economic Outcomes:

• Farm viability/sustainability
• Fair income for farmer
• Local economic circulation

• Reduced external input dependency

• Holonic Growth:

• Increasing Ubuntu alignment scores
• Growing network connections
• Balanced reciprocity patterns
• Regenerative impact evidence
• Movement toward "Contributor" or higher category

Ongoing Support: - Technical assistance and training - Peer learning networks - Problem-solving consultation - Resource connections - Community facilitation - Recognition and celebration

Reporting Requirements: - Quarterly progress reports (narrative + photos/data) - Annual comprehensive assessment - Milestone completion documentation - Financial transparency (token usage) - Community impact documentation

Evolution Path: Participant → Contributor → Integrator → Exemplar - As farmer succeeds, holonic score rises - Increased recognition and influence - Potential to become mentor/trainer - May become Community Activator (see Profile 3)

Long-term Relationship: - Not one-time transaction - Ongoing ecosystem membership - Continued token earning through participation - Potential for additional allocations for expansion - Possible leadership roles in governance

Profile 2: COMMUNITY

Definition

Organized groups working collectively on food sovereignty, regenerative food systems, or bioregional resilience initiatives.

Profile 2A: Applicant Community (Pre-Approval)

Status: Not yet in the UBEC ecosystem

Characteristics: - Existing community organization or forming collective - Shared commitment to food sovereignty and regenerative practices - Democratic or consensus-based governance - Neighborhood, village, cooperative, or indigenous community - May include multiple farmers, households, or institutions - Seeking resources for collective infrastructure or programs

Application Triggers: - Need for shared infrastructure (community gardens, tool libraries, processing facilities) - Establishing community food hub or distribution system - Creating community-supported agriculture (CSA) program - Developing community land trust or cooperative farm - Building community resilience and food security - Restoring traditional/indigenous food systems - Creating educational/demonstration sites

Evaluation Criteria: - Collective Commitment: - Demonstrated community engagement - Shared vision for food sovereignty - Democratic decision-making processes - Inclusive participation structures - Conflict resolution mechanisms - Long-term sustainability plan

• Regenerative Approach:
• Ecosystem-based practices
• Biodiversity protection
• Soil and water stewardship
• Cultural preservation
• Intergenerational knowledge transfer

• Climate adaptation strategies

• Community Benefit:

• Food access improvements
• Economic circulation within community
• Skills and knowledge building
• Social cohesion strengthening
• Health and wellness impacts

• Empowerment of marginalized members

• Organizational Capacity:

• Governance structure
• Financial management ability
• Communication systems
• Project management experience
• Community accountability

• Partnerships and networks

• Equity and Inclusion:

• Diverse participation
• Accessibility considerations
• Fair benefit distribution
• Power-sharing mechanisms
• Cultural respect
• Addressing historical injustices

Application Process: 1. Initial Inquiry: Community representative(s) express interest 2. Community Assessment: Governance, capacity, vision, needs 3. Stakeholder Engagement: Broad community input and validation 4. Project Design: Collaborative development of community plan 5. Evaluation Committee Review: Assessment against criteria 6. Decision: Approval, conditional approval, or guidance for reapplication 7. Agreement Drafting: Terms, governance, token allocation, milestones, accountability 8. Community Ratification: Democratic approval by community members 9. Agreement Signing: Legal commitment by authorized representatives 10. Certification: Official recognition as UBEC-funded community 11. Token Allocation: UBEC tokens transferred to community account/treasury

Token Allocation Factors: - Community size and scope - Project complexity and timeline - Infrastructure needs - Number of direct beneficiaries - Broader community impact potential - Local economic context - Typically ranges: [Define your range, e.g., 10,000 - 200,000 UBEC tokens]

Required Documentation: - Community profile and governance structure - Stakeholder list and engagement evidence - Food sovereignty plan - Budget and resource needs - Letters of support from members - Timeline and milestones - Impact projections (food access, ecosystem health, social cohesion, economic effects) - Conflict resolution and accountability mechanisms

Timeline: - Application to decision: 60-90 days (community engagement takes time) - Agreement to token allocation: 14-21 days

Support During Application: - Community organizing assistance - Governance design guidance - Technical resource connections - Peer community connections - Facilitation for challenging conversations - Legal/structural advice

Profile 2B: Funded Community (Post-Approval)

Status: Active UBEC ecosystem participant

Characteristics: - Received initial UBEC token allocation - Implementing agreed community food sovereignty plan - Building collective capacity and infrastructure - Developing relationships with other ecosystem participants - Contributing to bioregional resilience - Learning and adapting together

Initial Holonic Category: Typically starts as "Contributor" (0.6-0.8) - Collective nature implies higher integration - Multiple connections from the start - Shared governance demonstrates Ubuntu alignment - Community benefit orientation evident

Token Usage Patterns: - Infrastructure development (community gardens, shared facilities) - Equipment and tool purchases (shared ownership) - Educational programs and workshops - Stipends for coordinators/workers - Seeds, plants, and inputs for community projects - Event costs (gatherings, celebrations, work parties) - Exchange with other communities and farmers - Support for individual member projects

Responsibilities: - Implement community food sovereignty plan as agreed - Maintain democratic/inclusive governance - Report on progress and impact - Facilitate knowledge sharing within and beyond community - Build relationships with other ecosystem participants - Ensure equitable benefit distribution among members - Maintain commitment to regenerative principles - Document and share learnings

Success Indicators: - Food Sovereignty Outcomes: - Increased local food production - Improved food access for community members - Reduced dependency on external food systems - Cultural food traditions maintained/restored - Community control over food systems strengthened

• Collective Capacity Outcomes:
• Governance effectiveness
• Conflict resolution success
• Shared decision-making quality
• Leadership development
• Skills distribution across members

• Organizational resilience

• Ecosystem Outcomes:

• Land health improvements
• Biodiversity protection/enhancement
• Water stewardship
• Climate adaptation

• Closed-loop resource systems

• Social Outcomes:

• Social cohesion strengthening
• Inclusion and equity improvements
• Intergenerational connection
• Mental and physical health benefits

• Community pride and empowerment

• Holonic Growth:

• Rising Ubuntu alignment scores
• Expanding network connections
• Balanced reciprocity patterns (giving and receiving)
• Strong regenerative impact
• Movement toward "Integrator" or "Exemplar" category

Ongoing Support: - Governance and facilitation assistance - Technical resource library - Peer community network - Problem-solving consultation - Conflict mediation when needed - Recognition and celebration - Leadership development opportunities - Policy advocacy support

Reporting Requirements: - Quarterly progress reports (narrative + photos/data + member stories) - Annual comprehensive assessment - Milestone completion documentation - Financial transparency (token usage and decision-making) - Community impact documentation - Governance health assessment - Equity and inclusion metrics

Evolution Path: Contributor → Integrator → Exemplar - Growing capacity and reputation - Regional influence and leadership - Model for other communities - Potential to mentor/support new communities - May spawn Community Activators (Profile 3) - Governance participation in UBEC ecosystem

Long-term Relationship: - Ongoing ecosystem membership (not one-time funding) - Continued token earning through participation and contribution - Potential for additional allocations for expansion - Leadership roles in bioregional networks - Ambassador for UBEC principles - Model and mentor for other communities

Profile 3: COMMUNITY ACTIVATOR

Definition

Skilled facilitators and practitioners who catalyze regenerative food system development through training, organizing, and capacity building across multiple communities and/or farms.

Profile 3A: Applicant Community Activator (Pre-Approval)

Status: Not yet in the UBEC ecosystem

Characteristics: - Experienced in regenerative agriculture and/or community organizing - Track record of successful facilitation and capacity building - Deep understanding of food sovereignty principles - Skilled in training, education, and mentorship - Connected to networks of farmers and/or communities - Commitment to serving multiple participants (not just their own farm/community) - May be independent practitioner, consultant, or affiliated with organization

Application Triggers: - Desire to scale impact beyond own farm/community - Recognition as trusted resource by farmers/communities - Capacity to serve multiple locations/groups - Interest in dedicating time to ecosystem development - Need for financial support to do activator work full-time or part-time - Invitation from UBEC ecosystem based on demonstrated expertise

Evaluation Criteria: - Expertise and Experience: - Regenerative agriculture knowledge - Community organizing skills - Training and facilitation abilities - Conflict resolution capacity - Cultural competency - Proven track record with farmers/communities

• Service Orientation:
• Commitment to serving others (not self-advancement)
• Humility and listening skills
• Adaptability to diverse contexts
• Respect for local knowledge and autonomy
• Collaborative rather than hierarchical approach

• Long-term dedication to food sovereignty

• Network and Reach:

• Existing relationships with farmers/communities
• Geographic scope of influence
• Diversity of contexts served
• Connections to broader movements
• Reputation among peers

• Access to resources and knowledge

• Methodological Approach:

• Participatory and empowering methods
• Ubuntu principle alignment
• Regenerative mindset (not extractive)
• Systems thinking
• Innovation and adaptation

• Evidence of effectiveness

• Capacity and Commitment:

• Time availability for activator role
• Organizational/planning skills
• Communication abilities
• Sustainability of proposed activities
• Realistic scope and timeline
• Willingness to report and share learnings

Application Process: 1. Initial Expression of Interest: Activator describes background, vision, proposed services 2. Portfolio Review: Assessment of past work, testimonials, documented impact 3. Reference Checks: Conversations with farmers/communities previously served 4. Proposal Development: Detailed plan for activator services (who, what, where, when, how) 5. Evaluation Committee Review: Assessment against criteria 6. Decision: Approval, conditional approval, or guidance for reapplication 7. Agreement Drafting: Scope of work, expectations, token allocation (often annual stipend + project costs), reporting requirements 8. Agreement Signing: Legal commitment by both parties 9. Certification: Official recognition as UBEC Community Activator 10. Token Allocation: Initial UBEC tokens transferred (may be structured as monthly stipend + project budgets)

Token Allocation Factors: - Scope of activator role (full-time vs. part-time) - Geographic reach and number of participants served - Complexity of services (training, organizing, technical assistance, research, etc.) - Project costs (travel, materials, event expenses) - Local cost of living - Track record and experience level - Typically ranges: [Define your range, e.g., 20,000 - 100,000 UBEC tokens annually] - May include base stipend + project budgets - May be structured as monthly or quarterly disbursements

Required Documentation: - Professional background and experience summary - Portfolio of past work (photos, case studies, testimonials) - References from farmers/communities served - Detailed activator work plan - Budget (stipend needs + project costs) - Geographic scope and target participants - Timeline and milestones - Impact projections (capacity built, knowledge transferred, networks strengthened) - Reporting and accountability plan

Timeline: - Application to decision: 45-75 days (includes reference checks and proposal refinement) - Agreement to initial token allocation: 7-14 days

Support During Application: - Proposal development assistance - Budget planning guidance - Connection to peer activators - Clarity on expectations and reporting - Legal/contractual support

Profile 3B: Funded Community Activator (Post-Approval)

Status: Active UBEC ecosystem participant

Characteristics: - Receiving UBEC token allocation (stipend + project funds) - Actively serving multiple farmers and/or communities - Building capacity across ecosystem - Facilitating knowledge exchange - Modeling Ubuntu principles - Contributing to ecosystem learning and adaptation

Initial Holonic Category: Typically starts as "Integrator" (0.6-0.8) - Demonstrated network connections - Service to multiple participants - Ubuntu alignment evident in work - Bridge-building role

Token Usage Patterns: - Personal stipend (livelihood support) - Travel costs (to visit farmers/communities) - Training materials and supplies - Event/workshop expenses - Communication and technology tools - Professional development - Collaboration with other activators - Contribution to ecosystem initiatives

Responsibilities: - Deliver activator services as agreed in work plan - Serve farmers/communities with humility and respect - Build capacity rather than create dependency - Facilitate knowledge exchange and peer learning - Document and share methodologies and learnings - Report regularly on activities and impact - Participate in activator peer network - Model Ubuntu principles in all interactions - Contribute to UBEC ecosystem learning and evolution - Maintain high ethical standards

Success Indicators: - Direct Service Outcomes: - Number of farmers/communities served - Quality of relationships (trust, satisfaction) - Capacity built (new skills, knowledge, confidence) - Problems solved or progress made - Networks strengthened or created - Tangible improvements in regenerative practices or community organization

• Systemic Impact:
• Farmer-to-farmer or community-to-community connections facilitated
• Knowledge spread beyond direct services
• Ecosystem health improvements attributable to services
• Policy or institutional changes influenced

• Broader movement strengthening

• Innovation:

• New methodologies developed or adapted
• Context-specific solutions created
• Successful integration of traditional and contemporary knowledge

• Replicable models demonstrated

• Network Contribution:

• Participation in UBEC governance
• Collaboration with other activators
• Resource/knowledge sharing
• Problem-solving for ecosystem challenges

• Ambassador role for UBEC principles

• Knowledge Contribution:

• Documentation quality and usefulness
• Training effectiveness
• Innovation and adaptation
• Best practices identified

• Challenges and solutions shared

• Holonic Growth:

• Rising Ubuntu alignment scores
• Expanding network connections
• Exceptional reciprocity balance (giving much, receiving gratitude and trust)
• Strong regenerative impact
• Movement toward "Exemplar" status

Ongoing Support: - Peer activator network - Technical resource library - Mentorship from experienced activators - Professional development opportunities - Problem-solving consultation - Recognition and celebration - Leadership development - Governance participation opportunities

Reporting Requirements: - Monthly activity reports - Quarterly outcome assessments - Annual comprehensive evaluation - Financial documentation (token usage) - Community feedback collection - Impact stories and case studies - Lessons learned documentation - Milestone achievement verification

Evolution Path: Integrator → Exemplar → System Leader - Growing expertise and reputation - Regional/network leadership roles - Curriculum/program development - Policy engagement - Governance participation - Mentor to new activators - System design contributions

Long-term Relationship: - Ongoing ecosystem role (not temporary) - Continued token earning through service - Renewable annual agreements - Potential for expanded scope - Leadership in UBEC governance - Ambassador for UBEC principles - Bridge to broader food sovereignty movements

Profile 4: LIVING LAB

Definition

Educational institutions or community organizations operating land-based learning sites that integrate environmental monitoring, citizen science, and reciprocal economics through IoT technology and blockchain-based recognition systems.

Profile 4A: Applicant Living Lab (Pre-Approval)

Status: Not yet in the UBEC ecosystem

Characteristics: - Educational institution (school, university) or community learning organization - Access to land suitable for diverse ecosystems (minimum ~1,000 square meters) - Commitment to hands-on environmental education - Interest in integrating technology with nature observation - Willingness to install and maintain environmental sensors - Student/participant base for ongoing engagement - Educator capacity for curriculum integration - Technical capacity or willingness to develop it

Application Triggers: - Desire to enhance environmental science education - Interest in citizen science participation - Need for infrastructure to support outdoor learning - Goal to integrate blockchain/Web3 concepts into curriculum - Community request for accessible environmental data - Research interest in longitudinal environmental monitoring - Grant opportunity requiring innovative educational approaches

Evaluation Criteria: - Educational Commitment: - Clear educational mission and curriculum integration plan - Student/participant engagement capacity - Teacher/educator readiness and enthusiasm - Age-appropriate learning design - Multi-generational participation potential - Long-term educational sustainability

• Physical Infrastructure:
• Suitable land with diverse ecosystems
• Accessibility for students and community
• Potential for food production integration
• Water features or access for ecological diversity
• Safety and supervision considerations

• Sustainable site management plan

• Technical Capacity:

• WiFi connectivity or ability to establish it
• Technical support availability (staff or partners)
• Data management understanding
• Willingness to learn IoT and blockchain concepts
• Equipment maintenance capacity

• Integration with existing digital systems

• Citizen Science Orientation:

• Understanding of scientific observation methods
• Commitment to data quality and consistency
• Participation in broader scientific networks
• Public data sharing willingness

• Research ethics and student safety protocols

• Community Integration:

• Public access or community involvement plan
• Partnership with local environmental groups
• Contribution to local food sovereignty
• Knowledge sharing beyond institution
• Bioregional network participation

Application Process: 1. Initial Inquiry: Institution expresses interest in living lab program 2. Site Assessment: Land evaluation, technical requirements, educational capacity 3. Stakeholder Engagement: Teachers, students, administrators, community input 4. Educational Plan Development: Curriculum integration, age-appropriate learning pathways 5. Technical Plan Development: Sensor placement, network setup, data management, blockchain integration 6. Evaluation Committee Review: Assessment against criteria 7. Decision: Approval, conditional approval, or guidance for development 8. Agreement Drafting: Terms, equipment specifications, educational commitments, data protocols, token distribution 9. Agreement Signing: Legal commitment by authorized institutional representatives 10. Equipment Provision: SenseBox or equivalent IoT environmental station, installation support 11. Training: Technical training, educational resources, curriculum materials 12. System Activation: Sensor deployment, blockchain wallet creation, data flow verification 13. Token Allocation: Initial UBEC tokens for setup costs, ongoing UBECrc for data contributions

Token Allocation Factors: - Initial infrastructure costs (equipment, installation, network setup) - Ongoing operational support needs - Student/participant engagement scale - Educational program complexity - Community benefit reach - Data contribution value - Typically ranges: - Initial setup: 5,000 - 25,000 UBEC tokens - Ongoing data contributions: ~7.14 UBECrc per reading (2,880 readings/day = ~20,000 UBECrc/day)

Required Documentation: - Institutional profile and educational mission - Site description with photos/maps - Technical infrastructure assessment - Curriculum integration plan - Student/participant engagement plan - Data management and ethics protocols - Community benefit plan - Sustainability and maintenance plan - Budget for setup and ongoing operations - Timeline and milestones

Timeline: - Application to decision: 45-60 days - Equipment procurement and installation: 14-30 days - Training and system activation: 7-14 days - Full operation: 60-90 days from application

Support During Application: - Site assessment assistance (virtual or in-person) - Technical planning guidance - Curriculum development resources - Equipment specifications and sourcing - Network setup consultation - Partnership facilitation

Profile 4B: Funded Living Lab (Post-Approval)

Status: Active UBEC ecosystem participant

Characteristics: - Operational environmental sensors transmitting data 24/7 - Students/educators engaged in phenomenological observation - Data flowing to UBEC cloud infrastructure - UBECrc tokens automatically distributed for contributions - Educational curriculum actively integrating living lab - Community access and engagement - Contributing to citizen science networks - Research and monitoring ongoing

Initial Holonic Category: Typically starts as "Contributor" (0.6-0.8) - Institutional stability implies higher trust - Consistent data contribution demonstrates reliability - Educational mission aligns with Ubuntu principles - Community benefit orientation - Multi-stakeholder engagement

Token Usage Patterns: - Equipment maintenance and upgrades - Educational materials and supplies - Student/teacher training and professional development - Community events and workshops - Data management infrastructure - Research partnerships - Ecosystem improvements (plantings, habitat creation) - Sharing with other living labs or educational networks

Responsibilities: - Maintain operational sensor infrastructure - Ensure consistent data quality and transmission - Integrate living lab into educational programming - Engage students in hands-on observation and data literacy - Share data publicly through OpenSenseMap or equivalent - Participate in citizen science networks - Document educational outcomes and student learning - Maintain site ecosystems sustainably - Provide community access and programming - Share best practices with other living labs - Report on progress and impact

Success Indicators: - Technical Performance: - System uptime (target: >95%) - Data quality scores (target: >90/100) - Consistent transmission frequency - Equipment maintenance responsiveness - Network reliability

• Educational Outcomes:
• Student engagement levels
• Learning across multiple domains (environmental science, data science, blockchain, IoT)
• Curriculum integration depth
• Teacher confidence and capability
• Age-appropriate learning progressions

• Student-generated research projects

• Environmental Outcomes:

• Longitudinal data sets building
• Ecosystem health improvements on site
• Biodiversity increases
• Student environmental stewardship behaviors

• Community environmental awareness

• Community Outcomes:

• Public access to data and site
• Community science participation
• Partnerships with local organizations
• Knowledge sharing events

• Bioregional network contributions

• Reciprocal Economics:

• Token distribution functioning properly
• Student/educator understanding of reciprocity
• Economic literacy development

• Fair value recognition for contributions

• Holonic Growth:

• Rising Ubuntu alignment scores
• Network connections with other living labs
• Balanced reciprocity (contributing data, receiving resources and support)
• Educational impact evidence
• Movement toward "Integrator" or "Exemplar" status

Ongoing Support: - Technical assistance and troubleshooting - Peer living lab network - Educational resource library - Professional development for educators - Curriculum development support - Research partnership facilitation - Equipment upgrade guidance - Problem-solving consultation - Recognition and celebration

Reporting Requirements: - Quarterly progress reports (system performance, educational integration, student engagement) - Annual comprehensive assessment - Educational outcomes documentation - Data quality and contribution metrics - Site ecosystem health monitoring - Community engagement documentation - Token usage transparency - Student/teacher testimonials and learning artifacts

Evolution Path: Contributor → Integrator → Exemplar - Growing technical and educational sophistication - Regional model and mentor for other institutions - Research publications and conference presentations - Curriculum development for broader adoption - Multi-site network leadership - Policy influence in education and citizen science - May spawn educational specialists (similar to Community Activators)

Long-term Relationship: - Ongoing ecosystem membership (not one-time funding) - Continued UBECrc earning through data contributions - Potential for additional sensors/equipment expansion - Leadership in educational living lab networks - Ambassador for integration of technology and nature - Model for anthroposophical/Waldorf engagement with Web3 - Bridge between education, citizen science, and regenerative economics

Unique Value Proposition: Living labs demonstrate that technology and nature are not opposites but complementary expressions of creative forces. They create "ecological-digital fluency" where students learn to observe with both human senses and digital sensors, bridging phenomenological experience with quantitative measurement. This prepares next generations to understand both natural and technological systems—and the reciprocal relationships connecting them.

Comparative Matrix

Cross-Profile Relationships

Farmer ↔ Community

• Farmers may be members of funded communities
• Communities may support individual farmers
• Farmers may graduate to community organizing
• Shared learning and resources

Farmer ↔ Community Activator

• Activators provide training and support to farmers
• Farmers provide real-world testing of activator methods
• Farmers may become activators themselves
• Mutual learning relationship

Farmer ↔ Living Lab

• Farms can serve as outdoor classrooms for living labs
• Student observations can inform farm practices
• Farmers can mentor students in agricultural practices
• Living labs can host farm demonstrations and workshops

Community ↔ Community Activator

• Activators facilitate community development
• Communities provide platform for activator work
• Communities may hire/contract activators
• Shared success metrics

Community ↔ Living Lab

• Living labs can be located on community land
• Communities provide student volunteer opportunities
• Community members participate in citizen science
• Shared resources and infrastructure

Community Activator ↔ Living Lab

• Activators provide training to educators and students
• Living labs provide real-world testing of educational methods
• Activators help integrate living labs into broader networks
• Shared focus on capacity building and knowledge transfer

Multi-Way Integration

• Living labs can document farm and community practices through environmental monitoring
• Farm and community data can inform living lab curriculum
• Community activators can facilitate connections between farmers, communities, and living labs
• All four profiles contribute to bioregional food sovereignty and environmental stewardship

Application Evaluation Framework

Evaluation Committee Composition

• UBEC team members
• Experienced regenerative farmers
• Community organizers
• Indigenous/traditional knowledge holders
• Food sovereignty advocates
• Technical experts (soil science, permaculture, environmental monitoring, IoT)
• Educational specialists (particularly Waldorf/anthroposophical)
• Regional representatives

Decision-Making Process

1. Individual evaluation by committee members
2. Scoring against criteria
3. Discussion of strengths/concerns
4. Community/reference input review
5. Collaborative decision
6. Feedback to applicant (approval or guidance for improvement)
7. Appeals process available

Approval Types

• Full Approval: Meets all criteria, immediate token allocation
• Conditional Approval: Meets most criteria, token allocation upon meeting conditions
• Deferred: Promising but not ready, guidance for reapplication
• Declined: Does not meet criteria, explanation provided

Post-Allocation Monitoring & Support

Check-In Schedule

• Month 1: Intensive support, ensure successful start
• Month 3: First formal check-in, address early challenges
• Month 6: Mid-term assessment, adjust if needed
• Month 12: Annual comprehensive evaluation
• Ongoing: Responsive support as needed

Success Support Systems

• Peer learning networks (farmers with farmers, communities with communities, activators with activators, living labs with living labs)
• Cross-profile learning opportunities
• Technical assistance library
• Problem-solving hotline/help desk
• Regional gatherings and celebrations
• Online forums and knowledge bases
• Mentorship programs
• Recognition systems

Challenge Response

• Early warning system for struggling participants
• Intervention protocols
• Additional support provision
• Plan modification when needed
• Grace and flexibility with realistic accountability

System Integration

How These Profiles Relate to Overall UBEC User Groups

From Earlier User Group Document: These four beneficiary profiles are primary users within the broader "Token Holders" category, but with special status:

1. They receive tokens as grants, not purchases
2. They have additional responsibilities (reporting, community benefit)
3. They're evaluated on mission alignment, not just economic behavior
4. They're the core purpose of the 65% allocation

Integration with Holonic Evaluation: - Beneficiaries start at various holonic levels based on their profile - Their holonic scores track their Ubuntu principle alignment - Progress through holonic categories reflects their growth - High holonic scores may qualify for additional allocations - Exemplars become mentors and system leaders

Integration with Four Elements: - Air (UBEC): Initial gateway token for all beneficiaries - Water (UBECrc): Used in reciprocal exchanges within network (particularly for living labs' data contributions) - Earth (UBECgpi): Stable foundation for long-term holdings - Fire (UBECtt): Rewards transformative actions and regenerative impact

Future Expansion

As project grows, additional beneficiary profiles may include: - Food Processors: Value-added production for local foods - Seed Savers: Preserving and sharing local varieties - Young Farmers: Next generation support - Indigenous Food Initiatives: Cultural food tradition restoration - Urban Agriculture Programs: City-based food production - Food Justice Organizations: Addressing systemic food inequity - Regional Food Hubs: Distribution and aggregation - Farm Equipment Cooperatives: Shared resource management - Bioregional Coordinators: Larger-scale facilitation - Research Institutions: Academic partnerships studying regenerative systems - Climate Monitoring Networks: Expanded environmental sensing infrastructure

Key Success Metrics Across All Profiles

Food Sovereignty Indicators

• Local food production increases
• Food access improvements
• Reduced external dependency
• Cultural food preservation
• Community control over food systems

Regenerative Agriculture Indicators

• Soil health improvements
• Biodiversity increases
• Water conservation
• Carbon sequestration
• Chemical input reductions
• Closed-loop systems development

Community Resilience Indicators

• Social cohesion strengthening
• Economic resilience improvements
• Skills and knowledge growth
• Intergenerational participation
• Conflict resolution capacity
• Democratic decision-making

Network Health Indicators

• Ubuntu alignment scores rising
• Reciprocity patterns strengthening
• Network connections expanding
• Knowledge sharing increasing
• Collaborative initiatives multiplying

Environmental Monitoring Indicators (Living Labs)

• Data quality and consistency
• Longitudinal dataset development
• Citizen science contributions
• Educational outcomes in environmental science
• Public environmental awareness
• Technology-nature integration demonstration

Attribution

This project uses the services of Claude and Anthropic PBC to inform our decisions and recommendations. This project was made possible with the assistance of Claude and Anthropic PBC.

Document Control - Version: 1.1 - Author: UBEC Project Team - Date: November 9, 2025 - Status: Final - Next Review: Post-launch based on real application experience